Maternal exposure to carbon monoxide in the first trimester (7-13+6 weeks) of pregnancy in the core Niger Delta

Authors

  • Mkpe Abbey Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Amadi S. C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Ocheche U. S. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria PAMO University of Medical Sciences, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Wekere F. C. C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Altraide B. O. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Oloyede O. A. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Hospital Road, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria
  • Inimgba N. M. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, East-West Road, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Akani C. I. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, East-West Road, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20221571

Keywords:

Maternal exposure, Carbon monoxide, First trimester, Pregnancy, Niger Delta

Abstract

Background: Irrespective of the fact that the Niger Delta was known for its environmental pollution, neither organized environmental assessment nor human biomonitoring, including that of carbon monoxide (CO) had been performed in the region. The aim of the study therefore was to establish the severity of maternal impact on exposure to CO in the first trimester of pregnancy by quantifying the exhaled CO concentrations (ECOC) and to assess the effect of maternal age, body mass index (BMI) and parity on the severity of the impact.

Methods: The study was of cross-sectional design carried out at the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH) in Rivers State. 490 consecutive pregnant women in the first trimester were recruited from the antenatal clinic from January 2021 to January 2022. Gestational age was estimated with the aid of ultrasound scan. Demographic, social and obstetric characteristics were taken. Exhaled carbon monoxide concentration (ECOC) was measured with the aid of a smokerlyzer. Data was analyzed, using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (Armonk, NY) software. Ethical approval was obtained from the RSUTH ethics committee.

Results: The mean value of ECOC 3.25±2.51 ppm was more than that obtained in other studies. Out of the total 490 patients that were assessed, 335 (68.37%) had mild impact from CO exposure (ECOC=1-3 ppm), 129 (26.33%) – moderate impact (ECOC=4-6 ppm) and 26 (5.31%) had severe impact (ECOC=more than 6 ppm). Moderate and severe impacts were more prominent in women of age groups 25-39 years and the differences in various age groups were statistically significant [X2=20.671, p<0.036, 95% CI (0.032, 0.040)]. Patients with higher BMI were more likely to have moderate and severe impact than those with lower BMI- 6 (33.33%) and 4 (22.22%) out of the 18 patients with class III obesity had moderate and severe impacts respectively. The differences in the impact at various BMI were statistically significant [X2=20.671, p<0.001, 95% CI (0.001, 0.002)]. There was inverse relationship between parity and the severity of the impact and the differences in various parity groups were statistically significant [X2=10.580, p<0.012, 95% CI (0.101, 0.113)]. There was also a paradoxical finding of 3 smokers having only mild impact.

Conclusions: The mean value of ECOC 3.25±2.51 ppm was more than that obtained in other studies in non-pregnant women. Mild, moderate and severe impact from maternal CO exposure were established with the moderate and severe impact more prominent at maternal ages of 25-39 years, at higher BMI and at lower parity.

References

World Bank Defining an Environmental Development Strategy for the Niger Delta. Vol. 1, Industry and Energy Operations, West Central Africa Department. 1995. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/ (S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1557934. Accessed on 12 February 2022.

UNEP Environmental Assessment of Ogoniland. United Nations Environmental. 2011. Available at: https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/disasters-conflicts/where-we-work/nigeria/environmental-assessment-ogoniland-report. Accessed on 12 February 2022.

Green KI, Mkpe Abbey. Sources of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollution in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria. Saudi J Biomed Res. 2022;7(2):107-13.

Raub JA, Mathieu-Nolf M. Hampson NB. Thom SR. Carbon monoxide poisoning—A public health perspective. Toxicology. 2000;145:1-14.

Marzella L, Myers RAM. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Am Fum Physician. 1985;34:186194.

Bailey LTJ, Johnston MC. Billet J. Effects of carbon monoxide and hypoxia on cleft lip in A/J mice. The Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 1996;32(1):14-9.

Osborne JS, Adamek S, Hobbs ME. Some components of gas phase of cigarette smoke. Analytical Chem. 1956;28(2):211-5.

Dalhamn T, Edfors MLR. Retention of cigarette smoke components in human lungs. Arch Environ Health. 1968;17(5):746-8.

Silverman RK, Montano J. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment during pregnancy in acute carbon monoxide poisoning. A case reports. J Reproductive Med. 1997;42(5):309-11.

Cramer CR. Fetal death due to accidental maternal carbon monoxide poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1982;19(3):297-301.

Farrow JR, Davis GJ, Roy TM, McCloud LC, Nichols GR. Fetal death due to nonlethal maternal carbon monoxide poisoning. J Forensic Sci. 1990;35(6):1448-52.

Hutter CDD, Blair ME. Carbon monoxide—does fetal exposure cause sudden infant death syndrome? Med Hypotheses. 1996;46(1):1-4.

Abbey M, Amadi CS, Alpheaus MBA, Kwosah NJ, Nonye-Enyidah E, Kua P, et al. Human Biomonitoring of Maternal exposure to Carbon Monoxide in the First Trimester of Pregnancy in the Core Niger Delta. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec. 2022;5(5):272-80.

Smokerlyzer. Bedfont 1996. Available at: www.bedfont.com. Accessed on 12 February 2022.

Jarvis MJ, Belcher M, Vesey C, Hutchison DCS. Low-cost carbon monoxide monitors in smoking assessment. Thorax. 1986; 41:886-7.

Gomez C, Berlin I, Marquis P, Delcroix M. Expired air carbon monoxide concentration in mothers and their spouses above 5 ppm is associated with decreased fetal growth. Prev Med. 2005;40(1):10-5.

Pan KT, Leonardi GS, Ucci M, Croxford B. Can Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Be Used as a Marker of Exposure? A Cross-Sectional Study in Young Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;1811893.

Chatrchaiwiwatana S, Ratanasiri A. Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Levels Among Tobacco Smokers By Age. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017;48(2):429-37.

Yamaya M, Sekizawa K, Ishizuka S, Monma M, Mizuta K, Sasaki H. Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of subjects with upper respiratory tract infections. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:311-4.

Zayasu K, Sekizawa K, Okinaga S, Yamaya M, Ohrui T, Sasaki H. Increased carbon monoxide in exhaled air of asthmatic patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(4):1140-3.

Low ECT, Ong MC, Tan M. Breath carbon monoxide as an indication of smoking habit in the military setting. Singapore Med J. 2004;45:578-82.

Maga M, Janik MK, Wachsmann A, Chrza stek-Janik O, Koziej M, Bajkowski M, et al. Influence of air pollution on exhaled carbon monoxide levels in smokers and non-smokers. A prospective cross-sectional study. Environ Res. 2017;152:496-502.

Deveci SE, Deveci F, Acik Y, Ozan AT. The measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers. Respir Med. 2004;98:551-6.

Hung J, Lin CH, Wang JD, Chan CC. Exhaled carbon monoxide level as an indicator of cigarette consumption in a workplace cessation program in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006;105:210-3.

Robinson JC, Forbes. The Role of Carbon Monoxide in Cigarette Smoking. Arch Environ Health Int J. 1975;30:425-34.

Raub J. Environmental Health Criteria 213: Carbon Monoxide; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 1999;2:1-19.

Maga M, Janik MK, Wachsmann A, Chrza stek-Janik O, Koziej M, Bajkowski M, et al. Influence of air pollution on exhaled carbon monoxide levels in smokers and non-smokers. A prospective cross-sectional study. Environ Res. 2017;152:496-502.

Kao LW, Nanagas KA. Carbon monoxide poisoning. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2004;22:985-1018.

Vogt TM, Selvin S, Hulley SB. Comparison of biochemical and questionnaire estimates of tobacco exposure. Prev Med. 1979;8:23-33.

Weinhold LL, Stitzer ML. Effects of puff number and puff spacing on carbon monoxide exposure from commercial brand cigarettes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989;33:853-8.

Strasser AA, Lerman C, Sanborn PM, Pickworth WB, Feldman EA. New lower nicotine cigarettes can produce compensatory smoking and increased carbon monoxide exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:294-300.

Muhammad-Kah R, Liang Q, Frost-Pineda K, Mendes PE, Roethig HJ, Sarkar M. Factors affecting exposure to nicotine and carbon monoxide in adult cigarette smokers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;61:129-36.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles