DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170018

A study on clinico-pathological analysis of hysterectomies

Hema Sinhasane, Nishty GM

Abstract


Background: Routes for hysterectomy include abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, or combined approaches. Traditional abdominal hysterectomy (AH) is one of the most common gynaecological surgical procedures in the treatment of benign gynaecological diseases. However, AH as the most invasive procedure, is associated with some limitations such as abdominal trauma, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and slow postoperative recovery.

Methods: All the patients attending Gynecology outpatient department with symptoms were assessed with history and clinical examination by the Consultant Gynecologist and investigated. Those requiring hysterectomy were analyzed by the Consultants for the approach depending on the indication for the surgery, nature of the disease and patient characteristics.

Results: The most common indication for hysterectomy was prolapsed uterus (29.4%) followed by menstrual disorders (25.8%), leiomyoma (22.9%), and PID (12.3%).

Conclusions: Hysterectomy is successful in relieving pain, carcinomas and obstetric complication.


Keywords


Complications, Hysterectomy, Histopathology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sait HK, Anfinam NM, EL sayed ME Alkhayyat SS. Uterine sarcoma. Clinico-pathological characteristics and outcome. Soudi Med J. 2014;35(10):1215-22.

Ashraf-Anjoei T, Behtash N, Mosavi A. Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterine corpus, a clinico-pathological and survey study in 14 cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4;50.

Akyol D, Esinler I, Guven S, Salman MC, Ayhan A. Vaginal hysterectomy: results and complications of 886 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:777-781.

Yi YX, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Guo WR, Su Y. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:1-18.

Brummer THI, Jalkanen J, Fraser J. National Prospective 1-Year Survey of 5279 Hysterectomies. Hum Reprod. 2009;10:2515-22.

Reich H, De Caprio J, Mc Glynn F. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surgery. 1989;5:213-6.

Falcone T, Paraiso MF, Mascha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(4):955-62.

Candiani M, Izzo S. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(4):304-8.

Boike GM, Elfstrand EP, DelPriore G, Schumock D, Holley HS, Lurain JR. Lapa-roscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: report of 82 cases and comparision with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(6):1690-701.

Jahan S, Das TR, Mahmud N, Mondol SK, Habib SH, Saha S. A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterec-tomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Ban-gladesh. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):254-7.

Gemignani ML, Curtin JP, Zelmanovich J, Patel DA, Venkatraman E, Barakat RR. Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: clinical outcomes and hospital charges. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73(1):5-11.

Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominalsurgery in patients with endometrial cancer a prospective ran-domized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80(2):239-44.

Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: patterns of recurrence and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(3):789-93.