DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20214066

Risk factors for post-partum hemorrhage in patients who underwent operative vaginal delivery in a tertiary care center

Gayatri Devi Sivasambu, Sujani B. Kempaiah, Urvashi Thukral

Abstract


Background: Operative vaginal delivery is a timely intervention to cut short second stage labor when imminent delivery is in the interests of mother, fetus, or both. It reduces second stage cesarean section morbidity and uterine scar and its influence on future obstetric career. The possible structural neonatal adverse outcomes due to operative vaginal delivery are well quantified. However, its effects on maternal outcome need to be understood better. In this paper, we study the effect of operative vaginal delivery on maternal post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) and the associated risk factors.

Methods: It was a retrospective study carried out for the period July 2016 to July 2020 at Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru. Total number of vaginal deliveries in this period were 6318. Out of these, 1020 patients underwent assisted vaginal delivery using vacuum/ forceps/ sequential use of instrument. Blood loss greater than 500 ml is considered PPH for the purpose of this study. 15% of the study population was noted to have PPH. We employ a multivariate logistic regression to identify statistically significant risk factors for PPH in women undergoing operative vaginal delivery.

Results: The logistic regression model identifies multiparity, maternal age, neonatal birth weight more than 3.5 kg, application of forceps in women with hypertensive disorders, III-degree tear, cervical tear to significantly increase the risk of PPH in our study population.

Conclusions: Certain factors seem to increase the risk of PPH in operative vaginal delivery. The risks and benefits must be weighed properly before use of instruments.


Keywords


PPH, Operative vaginal delivery, Risk analysis, Logistic regression

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. World Health Organization. 2017. Available at: https://www.who. int/reproductivehealth/topics/maternal_perinatal/pph-woman-trial/en/. Accessed on 3 June 2021.

Guidance Note on Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage, Maternal Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2015.

Postpartum Haemorrhage. Prevention and Management (Green-top Guideline No. 52). Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016.

Reichman O, Khayyat I, Emanuel M, Gal M, Samueloff A. A practical classification for detecting parturients at risk for postpartum hemorrhage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;214(1):S269-70.

Jaleel R, Khan A. Post partum haemorrhage-a risk factor analysis. Mymen Singh Med J. 2010;10(2):282-9.

Xu C, Zhong W, Fu Q, Yi L, Deng Y, Cheng Z et al. Differential effects of different delivery methods on progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage between Chinese nulliparous and multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;20(1):660.

Hiersch L, Bergel-Bson R, Asher D, Aviram A, Gabby-Benziv R, Yogev Y et al. Risk factors for post-partum hemorrhage following vacuum assisted vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1.

Hubena Z, Workneh A, Siraneh Y. Prevalence and Outcome of Operative Vaginal Delivery among Mothers Who Gave Birth at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Pregnancy. 2018;7423475.

Brun R, Spoerri E, Schäffer L, Zimmermann R, Haslinger C. Induction of labor and postpartum blood loss. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):265.

Eskandar O, Shet D. Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;29(2):119-22.

Maso G, Monasta L, Piccoli M. Risk-adjusted operative delivery rates and maternal-neonatal outcomes as measures of quality assessment in obstetric care: a multicenter prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:20.