DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20213842

Correlation of placental thickness with birth weight in singleton pregnancies

Mini Bedi, Hitika Sharma, Parvinder Singh Sandhu, Anshula Minhas

Abstract


Background: The placenta provides the physiologic link between a pregnant woman and the fetus. During pregnancy, the normal placenta increases its thickness at a rate of approximately 1 millimeter per week. The thickness is considered normal throughout the 2nd and 3rd trimester if between 2 and 4 cm. There is a need to identify the fetus failing to reach its growth potential because an early detection of intrauterine growth retardation will be beneficial to obstetric and neonatal care.

Methods: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 251 antenatal women from 24-39 weeks gestation were included in the study. After informed written consent, relevant history, examination, abdominal ultrasound was performed noting fetal biometry and placental thickness. The participants were followed until delivery and birth weight noted. Statistical analysis of birth weight (< and >2500 gm) with placental thickness was done.

Results: Mean age of the study was 25.88±4.34 years. The mean placental thickness in group A was 3.33±0.92 cm and in group B was 3.38±0.68 cm. Placental thickness showed a positive correlation with fetal weight (r=0.013), however it was not statistically significant. Uncomplicated pregnancy group had mean placental thickness of 3.40±0.70 cm. The difference of mean for placental thickness was statistically significant with respect to medical disorders (p=0.042).

Conclusions: Placental thickness does increase with increasing birth weight of the fetus and hence, subnormal or more than normal placental thickness is helpful in signalling important maternal conditions that may be detrimental to the fetus.


Keywords


Birth weight, Placental thickness, Singleton pregnancy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Percival R, Holland EL Sir, Brews A. Holland and Brews Manual of Obstetrics. 16th edin. B L Churchill Livingstone Pvt. Ltd; 1998:23.

Azpurua H, Funai EF, Coraluzzi LM, Doherty LF, Sasson IE, Kliman M, et al. Determination of placental weight using two-dimensional sonography and volumetric mathematic modelling. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27(02):151-5.

Wolf H, Oosting H, Treffers PE. Second-trimester placental volume measurement by ultrasound: prediction of fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(1):121-6.

Mayhew TM, Wijesekara J, Baker PN, Ong SS. Morphometric evidence that villous development and fetoplacental angiogenesis are compromised by intrauterine growth restriction but not by pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2004;25(10):829-33.

Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson WM, Prabhu K. Placental thickness and its correlation to gestational age and foetal growth parameters- a cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(10):1732-5.

Dudley NJ, Fagan DG, Lamb MP. Ultrasonographic placental grade and thickness: associations with early delivery and low birth weight. Br J Radiol. 1993;66(782):175-7.

Evers IM, Nikkels PG, Sikkema JM, Visser GH. Placental pathology in women with type 1 diabetes and in a control group with normal and large-for-gestational-age infants. Placenta. 2003;24(8-9):819-25.

Kinare AS, Natekar AS, Chinchwadkar MC, Yajnik CS, Coyaji KJ, Fall CH, et al. Low midpregnancy placental volume in rural Indian women: a cause for low birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(2):443-8.

Wolf H, Oosting H, Treffers PE. A longitudinal study of the relationship between placental and fetal growth as measured by ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(5):1140-5.

Hoogland HJ, de Haan J, Martin Jr CB. Placental size during early pregnancy and fetal outcome: a preliminary report of a sequential ultrasonographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138(4):441-3.

Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y, Bar-Oz B, Yanai N, Intrator O, et al. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk- a prospective cross-sectional study. Placenta. 2000;21(2-3):268-72.

Dombrowski MP, Wolfe HM, Saleh A, Evans MI, O'Brien J. The sonographically thick placenta: a predictor of increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2(4):252-5.

Mathai BM, Singla SC, Nittala PP, Chakravarti RJ, Toppo JN. Placental thickness: its correlation with ultrasonographic gestational age in normal and intrauterine growth-retarded pregnancies in the late second and third trimester. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2013;63(4):230-3.

Habib FA. Prediction of low birth weight infants from ultrasound measurement of placental diameter and placental thickness. Ann Saudi Med. 2002;22(5-6):312-4.