DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20213862

Acceptance of birth spacing methods and it’s determinants among postnatal women in a tertiary care setting from Kerala

Revathy P. Nair, Bindu Nambisan, Mayadevi Brahmanandan

Abstract


Background: According to VISION FP2020 healthy birth spacing is defined as delaying the first birth by two years and maintaining the birth interval of at least three years between the two children with the help of various contraceptives.

Methods: This was a hospital based cross sectional study conducted among primiparous postnatal women in the department of obstetrics and gynecology SAT hospital, Trivandrum for one year duration. 134 women who had their first delivery were included in this study. A semi structured questionnaire was used to study the sociodemographic variables, reproductive history, contraceptive knowledge, attitude towards contraception and intention to use birth spacing methods by interview technique.

Results: The acceptance of birth spacing methods among the study population was 56.8%. 59.1% opted to use family planning methods 6 weeks after delivery while 40.9% planned to use after 6 months. Determinants which were significantly associated with acceptance of family planning methods were education of wife (p<0.01), husbands’ education, socioeconomic status, religion and contraceptive awareness (p<0.01). 47.1% of women preferred DMPA injections, 39.1% opted for intrauterine devices. 13.8% of women opted for condom. Convenience, long term protection, and ease of use were the important reasons cited. The reasons for non-acceptance included fear of side effects, spouse not staying together, opposition from husbands, lack of awareness and religious restrictions.

Conclusions: Female literacy, accessibility, cafeteria approach, and counselling contributed to acceptance. If the availability and awareness of injectable contraceptives is made at all the points of health delivery system, the acceptance of birth spacing can further be increased and unplanned pregnancies avoided.


Keywords


Contraception, Birth spacing, Health education, Intrauterine devices, Cross sectional study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Eliason S, Baiden F, Quansah-Asare G, Graham-Hayfron Y, Bonsu D, Phillips J, Awusabo-Asare K. Factors influencing the intention of women in rural Ghana to adopt postpartum family planning. Reprod health. 2013;10(1):34.

Cates W, Karim QA, El-Sadr W, Haffner DW, Kalema-Zikusoka G, Rogo K, Petruney T, Averill EM. Family planning and the millennium development goals. Science. 2010;329(5999):1603-8.

Sachs JD, McArthur JW. The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals. Lancet. 2005;365(9456):347-53.

Dhak B, Saggurti N, Ram F. Contraceptive use and its effect on Indian women‟s empowerment: evidence from the National Family Health Survey-4. J Biosocial Sci. 2019;10:1.

Responsibility S. Women, society, and abortion worldwide. New York: Alan Guttmacher Insitute publication; 1999.

Maternal mortality in 2005. Available at: https://www.who.int/whosis/mme_2005.pdf. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

Lule E, Singh S, Chowdhury SA. Fertility regulation behaviors and their costs: Contraception and unintended pregnancies in Africa and Eastern Europe & Central Asia. Available at: https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/13783. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(15): 180923.

Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS, Vlassoff M. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and new born health. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/ report/adding-it-costs-and-benefits-investing-family-planning-and-maternal-and-newborn-health. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

India‟s vision FP 2020. Available at: https://advancefamilyplanning.org/sites/default/files/resources/FP2020-Vision-Document%20India.pdf. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

Jain AK, Winfrey W. Contribution of contraceptive discontinuation to unintended births in 36 developing countries. Family Planning J. 2017;48(3):26978.

Benny PV, Regi J, Anil BS. Pattern of contraceptive use among married women of reproductive age group in a rural panchayat in Kerala. Int J Med App Sci. 2013;2(3):287-92.

Alina AM, Saju CR, Catherin N. Family planning practices among married women of reproductive age group in a rural area in Thrissur District, Kerala, India. Int J Curr Res Acad Rev. 2015;3(11):36-42

Pawar AT, John A, Kumar D. Family planning practices in rural Kerala. Scholars J App Med Sci. 2014;2:19-21.

Suchithra ET, Sujina CM. Current Practice and Determinants of Family Planning Methods among Married Females in the Reproductive Age Group (15-49yrs) in a rural Setting, Kerala. Indian J Foren Community Med. 2016;3(1):13-9.

Padmaja Ravindra Walveker: Determinants of contraceptive use among married woman residing in rural areas of Belgaum. J Med Allied Sci. 2012; 2(1):7-11.

Sarkar S. Socio-demographic Differentials and Determinants of Contraception Methods Choice among currently married women in India. Available at: https://iussp.org/sites/default/files/event_call_for_ papers/IUSSP_long%20abstruct_contraception_sanjit%20sarkar.pdf. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

Rajaretnam T. Sociocultural determinants of contraceptive method choice in Goa and Kerala India. J Family Welfare. 2000;46(2):1.

Asari VG, Thulaseedharan JV. Contraceptive use and preferences of young married women in Kerala, India. Open Access J Contracept. 2018;9:1-10.

Rao BS, Mathada VC. Awareness and determinants of contraceptive use among nursing mothers in Bellary, Karnataka. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):QC15.

Family Welfare Statistics in India 2011. Available at: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/HealthandFamilyWelfarestatisticsinIndia201920.pdf. Accessed on 20 May 2021.