Published: 2021-09-27

A comparative study between total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies at tertiary care institute, Udaipur

Shatendra Kumar Goyal, Madhubala Chauhan, Babita Kanwat, Dinesh Mehra


Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological surgery. The most common indication is benign uterine disease. As the time is passing trend is towards those approaches which are minimally invasive, less painful, have less complications, less blood loss and are more cosmetic. Thus, total laparoscopic hysterectomy has gained popularity. The purpose of this study was to compare the 2 different routes of hysterectomy.

Methods: In this prospective randomized observational study patients undergoing both the types of hysterectomy, that is, TAH (total abdominal hysterectomy) and TLH (total laparoscopic hysterectomy) during 2 year period at Rajkiya Pannadhay Mahila Chikitsalaya RNT medical college Udaipur were included in the study. 50 women (25 in each group) aged between 31-72 years were included into the study.

Results: We observed that duration of surgery was found to be longer in TLH than TAH (112.56±19.45 min versus 57.9±19.26 min, P<0.001 (HS)). The length of hospital stay was less in TLH than TLH (p=0.0001) and the amount of intra-operative blood loss were also less in TLH than TAH (163.60±44.15 versus 313.20±123.48 ml, p<0.001). TLH group had early ambulation compared to TAH group (2.24±0.44 day versus 3.12 ±0.33 day, p<0.001), difference on the basis of length of hospital stay was highly significant which was shorter in TLH than TAH (4.40±1.15 versus 10.32±8.19 days, respectively; p<0.001). In current study patient satisfaction level was found highly significant between TLH and TAH (100% versus 56%, p<0.001).

Conclusions: TLH is a safe and effective method of doing hysterectomy. The present study concluded that TLH is associated with less hospital stay, less blood loss, less use of analgesics, early ambulation, early start of oral feed, and better patient satisfaction.



TLH, TAH, Hysterectomy, Benign uterine pathology

Full Text:



Nogueira-Silva C, Santos-Ribeiro S, Barata S, Alho C, Osorio F, Calhaz-Jorge C. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: retrospective analysis of 262 cases. Acta Med Port. 2014;27(1):73-81.

Jones HW, Rock JA. Te Linde’s operative gynecology. Abdominal hysterectomy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.

Morton M, Cheung VY, Rosenthal DM. Total laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparison. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30(11):1039-44.

Kluivers KB, Johnson NP, Chien P, Vierhout ME, Bongers M, Mol BW. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;136(1):3-8.

Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144(1):3-7.

Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Barlow D. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Coch Data Systemat Rev. 2009;3:3677.

Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34-7.

Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Buttarelli M, Tateo S, Balestreri D. Incisional hernia in gynecologic oncology patients: a 10-year study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:696-700.

Obermair A, Manolitsas TP, Leung Y, Hammond IG, McCartney AJ. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(2):319-24.

Reich H. New techniques in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;3(3):655-81.

Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Gordon S, Wilkins E. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med. 1992;37(3):247-50.

Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S. Evaluate hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(26):1-154.

Graves EJ. National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual Summary, 1992. Vital Health Stats 13. 1994;119:1-63.

Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(6):895-901.

Boike GM, Elfstrand EP, DelPriore G, Schumock D, Holley HS, Lurain JR. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital: Report of 82 cases and comparison with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1690-701.

McPherson K, Herbert A, Judge A, Clarke A, Bridgman S, Maresh M, et al. Psychosexual health 5 years after hysterectomy: population-based comparison with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Health Expectat. 2015;8(3):234-43.

Farquhar CM, Sadler L, Harvey SA, Stewart AW. The association of hysterectomy and menopause: a prospective cohort study. Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2005;112(7):956-62.

Massimo C, Stefano I, Alessandro B, Riparini J, Ronzoni S, Marconi A. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):465-6.

Rock JA, Howard WJ. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Te Linde’s operative gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008: 763-73.

Falcone T, Walters MD. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):753-67.

Mallick R, English J, Waters N. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of benign gynaecological disease: a retrospective review over 5 years. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13(4):359-64.

Harkki-Siren P, Sjoberg J, Toivonen J, Tiitinen A. Clinical outcome and tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(10):866-71.

Gupta P, Chandra S, Kulshrestha R, Kulshrestha MR, Ghai S. A comparative study between total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and conventional total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in non-neoplastic uterine diseases. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;4(3):188-91.

Liang CC, Lee CL, Chang TC, Chang YL, Wang CJ, Soong YK. Postoperative urinary outcomes in catheterized and non-catheterized patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy – a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(3):295-300.

Dunn TS, Shlay J, Forshner D. Are in-dwelling catheters necessary for 24 hours after hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):435-7.

Charoenkwan K, Matovinovic E. Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Coch Data Systemat Rev. 2014;12:004508.

Bisgaard T, Kehlet H. Early oral feeding after elective abdominal surgery-what are the issues? Nutrition. 2002;18(11-12):944-8.

28. Pather S, Loadsman JA, Mansfield C, Rao A, Arora V, Philp S et al. (2011): Perioperative outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with fast-track open hysterectomy - a retrospective case control study. ANZJOG., 51(5): 393-6.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):155-9.

Komatsu H, Taniguchi F, Nagata H, Nakaso T, Nagaya Y, Tsukihara S. Retrospective evaluation of the crucial factor in total laparoscopic hysterectomy by using video review. Laparosc Surg. 2019;3(23).