Wound grading and surgical site infection following caesarean section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20212648Keywords:
Deep spaces, Infection, Surgical site, Superficial, WoundAbstract
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) following caesarean section can adversely influence the postpartum period for the women. The objective of the study was to study the extent of infection and the microbiological flora in cases of surgical site infection following caesarean section.
Methods: Women undergoing caesarean section amongst women admitted in labour ward were followed till discharge for any surgical site infection Detailed assessment of the wound was done. Any discharge if present was taken for culture.
Results: 88.88% had normal wound healing, implying no infection. Of those with abnormal wound, 22% had serosanguinous or purulent discharge. Most had superficial incisional SSI. Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus were the commonest organisms grown on culture.
Conclusions: All surgical site infections should be looked into as early as possible and managed appropriately.
References
Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran BW. High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population‐based cross sectional study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(2):106-11.
Vitale SG, Marilli I, Cignini P, Padula F, D’Emidio L, Mangiafico L, et al. Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel- Kerr techniques for Caesarean section: review of literature. J Prenat Med. 2014 Apr;8(3-4):36.
Bhargava S, Hooja N, Kala M, Mital P, Tulani K, Arora S, et al. Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour at a tertiary care hospital. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2019;69(6):558-60.
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care associated infection and criteria for specific type of infection in acute care setting. AMJ Infect Control. 2008;36:309-32.
Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784-91.
Tita AT, Rouse DJ, Blackwell S, Saade GR, Spong CY, Andrews WW. Evolving concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):675.
Opoien HK, Valbo A, Grinde-Anderson A, Walberg M. Post caesarean surgical site infections according to CDC standards: rates and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:1097-102.
Raka L. Prevention and control of hospital-related infections in low and middle income countries. Open Infect Dis J. 2010;4:125-31.
Gelaw KA, Aweke AM, Astawesegn FH, Demissie BW, Zeleke LB. Surgical site infection and its associated factors following cesarean section: a cross sectional study from a public hospital in Ethiopia. Patient Safety Surg. 2017;11(1):1-7.
Williams NS, O'Connell PR, McCaskie A, eds. Bailey and Love’s short practice of surgery. 27th edn. CRC press; 2018.
Committee Opinion no. 465. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for caesarean delivery: Timing of administration. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;465:791-2.
Vallejo MC, Attaallah AF, Shapiro RE, Elzamzamy OM, Mueller MG, Eller WS. Independent risk factors for surgical site infection after cesarean delivery in a rural tertiary care medical center. J Anesth. 2017;31(1):120-6.
Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, Hulsey T, Vandorsten JP, Soper D. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):455-e1.
Wolch C, Wilson J, Lamagni T, Harrington P, Charlett A, Sheridan E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119:1324-33.
Zejnullahu VA, Isjanovska R, Sejfija Z, Zejnullahu VA. Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1-9.
