DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183461

Second trimester placental thickness: its’ correlation with gestational age, femur length and biparietal diameter

Sandesh Ganjoo, Shalini Devgan, Ghanshyam Dev

Abstract


Background: Placental thickness (PT) is the easiest placental dimension to measure, yet little is known about the normal PT. The aim of this study was to determine the normal, sonographically measured PT in millimetre (mm) in the second trimester and to determine if this measurement can be adjusted for gestational age for that time and evaluate its relationship with femur length and biparietal diameter of the fetus.

Methods: The study was a cross sectional observational study, recruiting 100 consecutive, singleton pregnancies, reporting for ultrasonography (USG) between 14 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation, having undergone at least one ultrasonogram in the first trimester, with known last menstrual period (LMP). The placental thickness was measured perpendicular to the uterine wall, through the placenta at the site of cord insertion.

Results: The average age of study population was 24.96 with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.70 years with the minimum age being 18 years and maximum age being 32 years. Regression analysis yielded the following mathematical relationships between PT, Gestational age (GA), Biparietal diameter (BPD) and Femur length (FL) in the second trimester. Y(PT)= 0.9366x (Gestation age)+1.655, R2 = 0.7332; Y(PT)= 0.2872x(BPD)+6.9578, R2= 0.7314; Y(PT)=0.2995x(FL)+ 10.03, R2 = 0.6186

Conclusions: PT in present study showed a positive linear correlation with gestational age, FL and BPD in second trimester. Also, it can be concluded that PT may be used as a predictor of GA in women with unknown LMP.


Keywords


Biparietal diameter, Femur length, Gestational age, Placental thickness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KS, Gilstap LC, Hanth JC, Wenstrom KD, in Williams Obstetrics, 21st Ed. McGrawHill;2001:85-108.

Saddler TW, Langman’s Medical Embryology. Baltimore ND. 9th ed. Lippincot’s Williams and Wilkins;2014:177-148.

Jain A, Ganesh K, Agarwal U, Kharakwal S. Placental thickness a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J Obst Gyne India. 2001;51(3):48-9.

Salafia CM, Maas E, Thorp JM, Eucker B, Pezzullo JC, Savitz DA. Measures of placental growth in relation to birth weight and gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:991-8.

Terry MB, Susser E. Commentary: the impact of fetal and infant exposures along the life course. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:95-6.

Barker DJP. Mothers, babies and disease in later life. London, England. British Med J Group. 1994.

Thame M, Osmond C, Wilks R, Bennett FL, Forrester TE. Second trimester placental volume and infant size at birth. Obst Gynecol. 2001;98:279-83.

Lee AJ, Bethune M, Hiscock RJ. Placental thickness in the second trimester: A pilot study to determine the normal range. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:213-218.

Thurston M, Weerakkody Y. Placental thickness. Available at https://radiopaedia.org/articles/placental-thickness Accessed on 2018 Aug 05.

Hoddick WK, Mahony BS, Callen PW, Filly RA. Placental thickness. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4:479-82

Pinette Mg, Pan T, Blackstone J, Pinette SG. Ultrasound placental thickness measurements and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(suppl):s167.

Kunlmann RS, Warsof S. Ultrasound of the placenta. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;39:519-34.

Suresh KK, Bhagwat AR. Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and its correlation with femur length. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2017 Jan;6(1):46-51.

Afrakhteh M, Moeini A, Taheri MS, Haghighatkhah HR. Correlation between placental thickness in the second and third trimester and fetal weight. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(7):317-22.

Karthikeyan T, Subramanium RK, Prabhu K. Placental thickness and its correlation to gestational age and fetal growth parameters-A cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012 Dec;6(10):1732-5.

Ohagwu CC, Abu PO, Ezeokeke UO, Ugwu AC. Placental thickness: A sonographic indicator of gestational age in normal singleton pregnancies in Nigerian women. Internet J Med Update. 2009 July;4(2):9-14.

Adhikari R, Deka PK, Tayal A, Chettri PK. Ultrasonographic valuation of placental thickness in normal singleton pregnancies for estimation of gestational age. Int J Med Imaging. 2015;3(6):143-7.

Mittal P, Hooja N, Mehndiratta K. Placental thickness: a sonographic parameter for estimating gestational age of the fetus. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2002;12(4):553-4.

Tiwari A, Chandnani K. A study to evaluate gestational age with the help of placental thickness. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:503-5.